Peer Review Policy
Learn about our rigorous double-blind peer review process and commitment to maintaining the highest standards of academic publishing.
Our Commitment to Quality
The journal is dedicated to ensuring that every published article meets the highest standards of scientific rigor, originality, and significance. The peer review process serves as the cornerstone of this commitment, providing a thorough and impartial evaluation of all submitted manuscripts.
Rigorous Double-Blind Review Process
Both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the entire review process.
Submission → Author submits manuscript through the online portal.
Editor Screening → Editorial team performs initial screening for scope and quality.
Rigorous Double-Blind Review → Manuscript sent to 2-3 expert reviewers. Identities are hidden.
Revision (if needed) → Authors receive constructive feedback and may revise.
Acceptance/Rejection → Editor makes final decision based on reviewer recommendations.
Publication → Article published online with open access and DOI.
Reviewer Selection Criteria
Expertise Matching
Reviewers selected based on demonstrated expertise in the specific subject area of the manuscript.
No Conflicts of Interest
Reviewers must declare potential conflicts and are recused if conflicts are identified.
Timely Response
Selected reviewers are expected to respond within 24 hours and complete reviews within 14-16 days.
Publication Track Record
Reviewers should have an established track record of publications in peer-reviewed journals.
Ethical Guidelines
Confidentiality
All manuscripts are confidential. Reviewers must not share or disclose any part of the manuscript.
No Plagiarism
Reviewers alert the editorial office if they suspect any form of plagiarism.
Data Integrity
Authors must ensure all data is accurate, original, and not fabricated or manipulated.
Constructive Feedback
Reviewers must provide honest, objective, and constructive feedback without personal bias.
Review Timeline
Average total time from submission to publication is approximately 4-6 weeks (27-42 days depending on revision stage).
| Stage | Timeframe | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial Screening | 2 Days | Initial quality and scope assessment |
| Reviewer Assignment | 1-2 Days | Identifying and inviting expert reviewers |
| Peer Review | 14-16 Days | In-depth evaluation by 2-3 expert reviewers |
| Editorial Decision | 2-3 Days | Decision based on reviewer reports |
| Author Revision | 5-14 Days | Minor: 5-7 days / Major: 10-14 days |
| Final Decision | 1-2 Days | Acceptance or rejection after revision |
| Production & Publication | 2-3 Days | Copyediting, typesetting, and online publication |